Orca Crypto
Menu
Start Here
Learn
Chains
Exchanges
Markets
Tools
Safety
More
Our tokens Book a session
Tools

Transfer cost calculator

Both routes, all three costs, and the amount below which crypto is the wrong answer.

6.36%Global average
14.99%Through a bank
3Costs counted
0Numbers sent anywhere
Loading live prices
$In dollars, before any fees.
World Bank, Remittance Prices Worldwide, Issue 54, Q3 2025 averages.
%Change this if you know your real rate.
%Buying the stablecoin. Card purchases are far higher.
%Turning it back into money they can spend. The number nobody quotes.
Which way is cheaper
The ordinary way costs
They receive
The stablecoin route costs
They receive
Break even amountBelow this, the ordinary way wins

Every number here is editable because every number here moves. The crypto side ships the expensive end of each published range on purpose, so the comparison is not flattered. Fees are not the whole story either: a bank gives you a receipt and somebody to call, and this route gives you neither.

Why the usual comparison is wrong

Three costs, not one

The version of this comparison you normally see puts a bank's full charge next to a blockchain's network fee. That is not a comparison. It is a bank's total against one line of a crypto total, and it makes a real advantage look like an absurd one.

Sending a stablecoin from your money to their spendable money is three costs. Two of them are percentages and one is flat, which is why the answer changes completely with the amount.

  1. You buy the stablecoin

    An exchange fee plus a spread. Around one percent through a bank transfer on a major exchange, and several times that on a debit card.
  2. You send it

    The part crypto advertises. Cents on most chains. On Ethereum mainnet it can be several dollars, which is why the chain matters more than anything else here.
  3. They turn it into money

    A local exchange, a peer to peer market, or a card. Usually the largest of the three, and where a currency is controlled it can exceed everything a bank would have charged. If you take one number in this tool seriously, take this one.
Why the break even matters
Two of the three costs scale with the amount and the network fee does not. So there is always an amount below which the ordinary way is cheaper, and the tool prints it. On small transfers the ordinary way frequently wins.
Where the traditional numbers come from

Not from us

The percentages in the dropdown are the World Bank's, from its quarterly Remittance Prices Worldwide survey. We use them rather than our own because a cost average published by a site that also runs a token is worth nothing, and theirs is worth something.

The headline finding is the spread between providers. The same $200, the same distance: 14.99 percent through a bank against 4.72 percent through a money transfer operator. Before you consider crypto at all, that gap is the cheapest saving available to most people.

Sent throughAverage total cost of sending $200
A bank14.99%
A money transfer operator4.72%
A mobile money operator5.58%
A post office5.58%
Sent toAverage total cost
Sub-Saharan Africa8.46%
Europe and Central Asia6.8%
East Asia and Pacific5.83%
Latin America and Caribbean5.64%
South Asia5.3%
Middle East and North Africa5.11%

World Bank, Remittance Prices Worldwide, Issue 54, Q3 2025 data. Global average 6.36%, down from 6.49% in Q1 2025. Source.

Common questions

Is sending money with crypto actually cheaper?

Above a certain amount, usually yes, and by a lot. Below it, no. The World Bank puts the global average at 6.36 percent and a bank at 14.99 percent, against cents for the transfer itself. But buying the stablecoin and cashing it out are percentages too, and the network fee is flat, so small amounts favor the ordinary route. That is what the break even figure in the tool is telling you.

Why is the off ramp cost the default two percent?

Because it is a conservative middle. In a country with deep exchange liquidity you might pay well under one percent. Where the currency is controlled or the local market is thin, the effective cost through a peer to peer market can be five to ten percent or worse. It is the number with the widest real spread, which is exactly why it is an input and not a constant.

Does this include the exchange rate?

The World Bank figures do: their total cost includes the foreign exchange margin, which is where most of a bank's charge actually hides. On the crypto side, the off ramp percentage is where you should account for the local rate you would really get, not the mid market rate on a chart.

Is a cheaper transfer worth the risk?

Sometimes not, and the tool cannot answer that. An irreversible transfer to a mistyped address is a total loss with no recourse, which is a real cost that does not appear as a percentage. If the saving is a few dollars, the ordinary route buys you a receipt, a reversal path and somebody to call.

Do you make anything if I use the crypto route?

No. There are no referral links in this tool and no exchange is recommended by it. The calculator is perfectly happy to tell you crypto is the wrong answer, which is most of why it exists.

Want a hand using these on your own position?

We go through it together on a call. Your holdings, your risk, your setup. You click everything and we never ask for keys.