Orca Crypto
Menu
Start Here
Learn
Chains
Exchanges
Markets
Tools
Safety
More
Buy OCX Book a session
What went wrong

The Squid Game token

A token that rose more than twenty thousand percent in a week and that nobody was able to sell, by design.

Loading live prices
By the Orca Crypto teamUpdated 2026-09-016 min readCase study
In one line

What happened

A token that rose more than twenty thousand percent in a week and that nobody was able to sell, by design.

WhenNovember 2021
What kind of failureHoneypot rug pull
What it costAbout $3.3 million, and a total loss for every buyer
What was promised

The version the public saw

SQUID launched during the peak popularity of the television series, claiming to be the token for a forthcoming play to earn game with the same theme. It had a website, a white paper and a Telegram group, and was covered by several mainstream news outlets as a story about the show's popularity.

What was actually happening

Underneath the same period

The contract contained an anti-dumping mechanism that prevented almost all holders from selling. Buying worked normally. Selling reverted. This is a honeypot, and it is visible to anybody who reads the contract or runs a sell simulation before buying.

How it came apart

The sequence

  1. The price only goes up

    With selling blocked, the chart could only rise. SQUID went from cents to about $2,861 in under a week, which itself attracted more coverage.

  2. Holders discover the problem

    Buyers reported being unable to sell. The Telegram group disabled comments. The white paper contained obvious errors and plagiarized text.

  3. The exit

    On 1 November 2021 the creators drained the liquidity pool and disappeared. The price went to effectively zero in five minutes.

  4. Nobody is identified

    The team was anonymous and no one has been charged.

What was visible at the time

The signals, before anybody knew the ending

None of these needed hindsight. Each one was public, or checkable, while the money was still there.

Warning signs
  • A chart that goes only upward, which is a symptom rather than a strength
  • No connection to the intellectual property being invoked, which was never claimed by the rights holder
  • A white paper with plagiarized text and basic errors
  • A community channel where comments were disabled
Where it stands now

The aftermath

No arrests. The funds moved through a mixer within hours. The case is regularly cited because the fatal flaw was machine checkable before anybody bought, in seconds, for free.

What to take from it

The part that changes what you do

The lesson

Every honeypot is detectable before you buy. Simulate a sell, which several token checkers do automatically, and read the contract for transfer restrictions. A chart that only goes up is not a token performing well, it is often a token you cannot exit.

Common questions

How do I check for a honeypot?
Run a sell simulation before buying. Several checkers do it automatically, including the one on this site. If the simulated sell fails, that is the whole answer and no other number matters.
Why did news outlets cover it?
Because the price move was extraordinary and the theme was topical. Several later published corrections. Coverage is not verification, and a token appearing in the press means only that a journalist saw the chart.
Is this still common?
Yes, constantly, at smaller scale. The mechanism has not changed and neither has the check that catches it.

Would your setup have survived this?

We go through where your coins actually sit and who is holding them, and what happens to each of those if the company behind it fails. No sales pitch, and usually about an hour.